MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD
Section 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Interest in the interest of the litigant for the prosecution, who acquired the interest and title in the disputed land under the disputed land, died. Later his legal heirs / defendants succeeded. Petitioners, who allegedly bought an undisclosed share of the disputed joint farm, expelled the former emperors / respondents from the land at trial, on a suit for recovery of the possession of the defendants under Special Section 9 Were taken into physical possession. The Relief Act, 1877, was answered in favor of the respondents / pre-emperors in the Supreme Court, after the Supreme Court finally terminated the first round of litigation, under the provisions of section 12 (2). Central application temporarily applied for a stay order. , CPC, which was dismissed by the trial and appellate courts below validation. Applicants to protest against the same matter again before the Civil Court reverses the decisions passed in the first round of trial till the judgment of the Supreme Court for the restoration of possession under Section 9 of the Special Relief Act, 1877. The authorization could not be allowed. The defendants, who were the ultimate successors, were entitled to the restoration of the occupation of the disputed land and the applicants could not retain their possession, which was used by the unlawful and unauthorized applicants as a tool to revoke court decisions. And the Supreme Court passed in favor of the respondents in the first round of litigation, mistreated the applicants, deposed them
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Sukkur lawyer