Find a Lawyer

IBRAHIM FLOUR AND GENERAL MILLS, DISTRICT SEIKHUPURA versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, FOOD DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

Section 3 Food Grease (Licensing Control) Order, 1957 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 25 and 199 Constitutional application before equitable classification, Applicable Principles Principle Wheat Distribution was equal to applicant's flour mill. And their complaint was that the government did not provide them with quota of wheat as per their privileges, which was taken by the authorities because the reduction in wheat production could not provide the required quantity of wheat. A ban on quota of flour can be equally levied on flour wheels, allowing authorities to prosecute. Ltd can. Demand for severe wheat shortage during the same period, issuing quetta, other flour mines was unreasonable and arbitrary selection or discrimination did not discriminate the government among citizens who were kept under similar conditions. Officials also could not be allowed to be arbitrary. At their wishes, releasing quotas for sweet wi ll or other flour cheeses in the way they pleased was categorical and oblique because of a set of mill owners against the rational classification of wheat quota. Delivery and denial of applicants was discriminatory, pregnant and tainted By the authorities, the solitary and reckless arbitration act by the authorities in neglecting applicants for wheat grants was declared illegal, discriminatory and Equal to the issuance of quotas demanding intervention and exercise by applicants, not of legal effect. Discrimination and discrimination deserved treatment. Judicial Review Options The High Court granted the authorities law firms from Saidu Sharif lawyer