MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE
Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 148 and 149 pre-arrest bail, denial of FIR in which the particular accused was named was immediately listed for any of the accused. The solid material could not be identified on the basis of which it could be held. In the absence of such misconduct, the accused was named in the FIR because of the police or the complainant's negligence. The case was supported, though they were the accused. The accused was found innocent by the police and their names were kept in column number 2, but no solid material was found, on the basis of which the accused were found innocent, even the opinion of the police was not binding on the courts. , Was alleged to have run afoul of the law. For a long time and after adopting all the legal customs, the accused was declared a fugitive, additional evidence could be used against them and fugitives were charged that the law would deprive them of some of their usual rights. He was not found to be entitled to extraordinary relief before his arrest; his bail application was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Sohawa District Daska lawyer