Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TAHIR versus STATE

Sections 17 and 22 of the Definition of Evidence accused the accused of being a relative of the complaining party, claiming that he could arrange for the complainant's son to be sent abroad for employment, and under the said excuse. He had received the money. 6,50,000 from the complaining party As the accused and his co-accused failed to perform the required work, the complainant repeatedly demanded of the complainant a sum of money in the question issued by the co-accused. Referred to the complaint, but said that the bank record, which was dishonored by the investigation, did not say whether the accused was beneficial to the transaction or not, but the background of the case to convict the accused if found guilty. The case is set by the circumstances of the trial court. On the accused, had adopted a slightly stringent view, in the circumstances the end of justice will be met, if a long view is punished in accordance with the sentence, then the accused will be punished while maintaining the conviction. Already reduced to the length of the passage, the penalty was reduced from Rs. 700,000 to Rs. female advocates from Mehrab Pur lawyer