The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the gift of land by the father in favor of his daughter collaterals, was also dismissed on the ground that his first and second appeals were also granted leave on the request that The gift was invalid because no possession was provided. No such objection was taken on the spot nor in any case did it appear that the High Court dismissed the second appeal, which was the main reason why the second appeal did not raise the question of non-availability of possession. Could go The names of the tenants and the couple were recorded as proprietary records because the High Court order in the revenue records is inconceivable, no interference was sought for leave.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
