MRS. PARVEEN AKHTAR versus LUCKNOW COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.
Defendants' claim that section 54 and 70 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), VII, R11 and Section 9 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), rejected the declaration requiring section 42 litigation notices Prior to filing a lawsuit against, the registrar was obliged to send notices, Waldetti plaintiffs were members of the society and subordinates of the society were bound by them, allotment of plots on the basis of scrutiny of the file by the society was canceled. The society and the dispute regarding the business of the society was of a civil nature. The society had allotted the plots to the plaintiffs and had canceled it by its subpoena. If the members of the plots were a business of the society, then the said allotment on scrutiny. The deletion of its members' files shows that the allotment was a violation of the by-laws or any other relevant rules and that the rule was also a business of the community should be disputed by the Registrar for its resolution under section 54 of the Cooperative Society Act, 1925 Laws and facts to the Registrar Society, declaring the need for Given the authority to decide the more complicated question, the plaintiff should have taken his dispute with the community to the registrar and if he was not willing to seek arbitration to settle his complaint, then the lawsuit was filed against the society's defendants. Before committing, he was obliged to send a notice to the Registrar; he did not send any notice to the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, saying that he was angry with the process of society and that he should take the Society to court in sections 54 and 70 of the Co-operative Society Act 1925. It was suggested to go before the affected party
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
