Find a Lawyer

ALI AKBAR versus SADAR DIN

O VII, R 11 Non-payment of judicial fees by the plaintiff's dismissal The trial court dismissed the case filed by the plaintiff but in the judgment the plaintiff was directed to submit the court fee within one month, otherwise the plaintiff's dismissal. The plaintiff did not submit the court fee. The trial court's decision by the appellate court remained, and the petition submitted by the plaintiff was that before the dismissal of the plaintiff, the appellate court should have been provided with an opportunity to indicate the court fee. Approved by the trial court, which otherwise obliged the plaintiff to meet the reduction of court fees within a month, which expired almost four years ago, the hearing of the appellate court's trial court order Defendant asserts that non-payment of judicial fees, O VII, R 11, Placed under CPC, will automatically be rejected stood The plaintiff was not obliged by the Court of Appeal for failing to comply with the terms of the order. Point to or give him the opportunity to pay court fees when the terms of the decree were comprehensive and clear and the trial court ruled The template was set. The payment of the court fees had already been exhausted and according to the order, the plaintiff was dismissed, the High Court found no legal error in the decision and the order passed by the Appellate Court was revoked. online advocate from Gaggo Mandi lawyer