MST. HAYAT KHATOON versus ASIF NASRULLAH KHAN
The Constitution Section of the Constitution Section Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Court Fees, decided the case of the petitioner in favor of the submission of the Effective Trial Court and directed him to submit the court fee within thirty days. The two lower courts had refused to extend the time to assemble. Applicant submitted a court fee stamp on the court fee but the applicant had submitted that the judicial fee stamps provided by him would be considered valid which was not submitted in any decision and order that the applicant. Failure to provide judicial fee stamp in a fixed period was decided by There was no prejudice between the litigation and the state treasury in the collection of court fees, especially when the money was deposited for the payment of court fees, not deliberately delaying the delivery of the court fee stamp. And not in the absence of any agreement or condition. And as a result, the court was not disappointed with the Court Fees Act, 1870, the R should not be strictly interpreted to frustrate the receipt of revenue revenue for the benefit of the State High Court. The jury set aside the orders sent by the two courts below and declared that the court fee stamp provided by the applicant is considered legitimate,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Jhal Magsi lawyer