Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFAQ versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR

Sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RR1 and 2, both the claimant and the plaintiff for joint declaration and permanent injunction were co-owners in the joint litigation suit when the joint suit for the distribution of the suit. The plaintiffs pending litigation in the suit were pending in court, without disclosing the fact of the case filed by the defendant, the defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff for declaration and injunction and to interfere with the defendant's possession and An interim order was also filed to prevent the trees from being cut / damaged. Both the courts on earth jointly allowed that the petitioner and defendant claim that they claim that the plaintiff did not deserve arbitrary relief because in reviewing when he had concealed the material conditions from the court. Ali's counsel correctly argued that all orders for granting interim relief to the plaintiff while granting interim relief were not justified. The plaintiff was approved by the courts below, they were kept aside in the circumstances. Was \ r \ n best law firms from Laliah lawyer