Prior to the completion of the renovation of the shop after the demolition of Article 9 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the tenant occupied a shop which was sued without the approval / permission of the landlord. The hearing was held by the court and the tenant. A revised and constitutional application against this order was dismissed. The finding of fact recorded by the trial court was that the tenant had forcibly occupied the shop. Such a finding was recorded by the trial court after considering the entire evidence and the tenant's review and constitutional application to the tenant. Was retained. Ple urges that the landlord have raised the issue of reopening the shop because it would be of no use, if it was to be completed after the renovation was completed, in which case the appeal was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
