MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus PAKISTAN WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3), before the Service Tribunal, was the opinion of two members who constituted the first member of the Appeal Bench to allow the appeals and set aside the orders for termination. To be given while the other member had the idea. Such appeals should be dismissed. Appeals were placed before the third member, the tribunal chairman, who agreed with the view that the appeals were dismissed but at the same time, they also took the stand that the petitioners were against. The imposed suspension order was not stated in proper words. And accordingly, the department was granted an appeal so that the third member did not give any reason for agreeing with the other member who proposed to dismiss the appeal, but his observation shows that the order Not satisfied with the terms of Eliminated and suggested to be amended, so that practically contradicting itself that the orders are deserved
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Abbaspur lawyer
