ABDUL HAMEED versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), provided that the front of the shop was not imitable and that the applicant was found to have less share of "Thara" than its site, which suggests that Thara's Partition will fail. To the extent the respondents were divided into shops, without the opening and the view provided by the immovable / tharay, the respondent could not have used his portion of the distribution petition request that nothing could be built on Thara. Was. Do Not Affect Distribution \ The petitioner's petition regarding the lower part of the Thera has not been brought before the High Court and a fact inquiry is also required. No justification for interference in wrong decision of High Court, leave of appeal denied in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Sherani lawyer
