Find a Lawyer

CHAUDHRY ABID RAZA versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL PUNJAB/LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE

The objections against the constitutional applicants of the Arts 62, 63 and 199 Representation for Public Act (LXXXV of 1976), Section 99 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 11 EE (4) were that they were members of a prohibited organization. And was a terrorist, pursuant to a notification / order issued by the provincial government under section 11EE (4) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 and thus could not participate in the elections, the petitioner admitted. An appeal was filed against the government order / notification. Section 11E (4) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, which was not decided within a legal time, however, did not mean that the filing of the said appeal, without any court-suspended order / notification Brought, the automatic removal of the order / notification under section 11EE (4) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 under section 11EE (4) of the provincial government did not result in thirty days. Was filed under the aforesaid clause of the law, therefore, Section 11EE (4) was not mandatory, rather it was a directive in nature that did not provoke the department's error / delay. Which was fixed in the decision to file your appeal. The constitutional petition was inactive and did not bother to clarify and record itself regarding the department which previously stated that the action taken by the provincial government against the applicant was baseless. Cannot be given After an error in extant orders, a constitutional petition against the applicant's rejection of nomination papers to contest elections was dismissed in the circumstances. best advocate from Gawadar lawyer