CH. MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, ISLAMABAD
Sections 18 (c), (d), 19, 27 and 34 Business Rules, 1973, R14 (1) (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 573 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Canceling the petitioner and his accomplices allegedly misappropriated huge sums of money using their powers and causing government damage, hearing the petitioner's petition filed under section 265 in the Accountability Court. Yes, the trial court's chairman dismissed the NAB representative for acquittal of the CRPC. The regional accountability commander inquired and investigated the applicant, saying that the chairman, NAB did not have the authority to assign the inquiry and investigation authority to the regional accountability commander and subsequently the letter of the commander to the anti-corruption establishment against the applicant. Guides the investigation. His co-accused were accused of being without legal authority by the special prosecutor of the NAB that the chairman had delegated to Section 18 (c) (d), 19 and 27 of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999 Assign your powers and duties under Commander Regional Accountability, who ordered the Anti-Corruption Establishment to launch an investigation against the applicant and his accomplice. It was ordered to initiate an inquiry against the applicant even otherwise the applicant's case was covered in section 373737, CPC error, error, irregularity in process, if any So, it was not enough to end the proceedings against the applicant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
