Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MANSHA versus HAMID SHAH ALIAS ABDUL HAMID SHAH

Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVI, RR 2 and 4 Law in Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 95 suit, which resulted in the application of the wig under the relief power of attorney Bona's alternative trial. About his wife who was executed at the disposal of the plaintiff, which was written in 7 197 1975 and registered in 16 4 1975, the wife sold the land of the accused through registered cell deed and the plaintiff three years later. He claimed that he did not appoint his wife as her. The lawyer, but in the alternative if she was so determined, she would have deliberately or unwittingly deceived her. It was also shown that the accused may have presented to another woman for the purpose of obtaining a lawyer's sale. That he was present at the time of his writing on the dates of the writing and registration of the Power of Attorney, and that his wife was fraudulently involved in the sale of Ion and the defendant's cell-deed, which was controversial. The claimants seriously reflect the dishonesty and integrity of the wife; the plaintiff was enforced as a plaintiff but did not file a written statement nor did she appear as a witness for support. Her husband and wife were living together, yet she was not prepared as a plaintiff to challenge the seller's transaction even though she was shown to be employed on relevant dates, but the possibility was rejected. It cannot be said that the power of attorney was executed by him on any other date, while on that date he was at his place of employment, in order to deceive the prospective buyers of property ounces. Issue Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kot Mithan lawyer