Find a Lawyer

SHAH MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 2302 (c) Definition of Evidence The right to self-defense, eviction of crime, and the recovery of weapons of crime, was rightly rejected by the trial court on the ground that the prosecution's witnesses, who were police officers, It was stated that the crime was cleared. And the weapons of crime were handed over to him for safe custody, but he was never handed over to the Chemical Examiner for safe custody, in his statement under Section 161, CR PC, Which shows that similar to the crime weapon from the crime scene, it has no use nor can it be used against the accused, as they both have the possibility of tampering with pieces of evidence. Also could not be ruled out, the presence of the accused at night and the possession of the accused in the vicinity had no motive for attacking. A. In view of the dispute between the parties, the deceased had no reason to be in the land of the accused; the presence of the complainant / prosecutor's witness at the time of the incident also raised suspicion from the perspective of the site plan prepared by the Patwari Prosecution. In this case, the trial against the accused was properly weighed in that he had attacked the accused with others and used them in favor of private rights. In order to protect his own person and property, he opened fire on him / her, resulting in his death. If it was said that the version of the accused was accepted, it cannot be said that the accused had exceeded his defense, alleging that he was acquitted of the charges leveled against him. Yes famous high court advocate from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer