Find a Lawyer

ABDUL REHMAN versus STATE

Sections 514 were charged with arrest of the bond of Securities Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 337 H (ii), 342, 379, 109, 148 and 149 bail for which the applicant remained on bail, presented before the court. In being, the applicant / bail was burdened. In order to pay the full bail amount, the petitioner had requested that due to a compromise between the complainant and the accused for whom the applicant was in bail, the case was canceled and it was stated that on the basis of misunderstanding. The accused were not present; the proper notice was not issued to the applicant while issuing the order of trial during the trial. The ruling on the accuracy revealed that the previous law was passed and the applicant / surety point was also ignored and the matter was remanded. After the appropriate hearing to the applicant, the trial court for the re-hearing of the case Pakistan, top advocate family court from Shogram lawyer