FAISAL NASEEM versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PUNJAB
Article 85 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicants' Memorandum to the Union Registrar's Complaint was that the procedure adopted by the respondents in the memorandum of the memorandum was against the principles of justice which the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001. Is listed in section 85 (7). , Which also stated that applicants had to be given advance notice before considering the memorandum and that attendees should also be given the right to defend themselves before being proved by the House respondent in the present case. The actual receipt form is proof that the notes were presented to the moderator and the deputy for the purposes of resuming the memorandum, which was fully fulfilled by the law's requirement and the defendant did not have any There was no illegal action of the kind, the applicants were not entitled to any relief in the constitutional petition. Even the applicants had in fact disputed the constitutional petition, which could not be implemented in these proceedings. The petition could not contain controversial questions of fact, only to be issued in writing. Where the record itself shows that the relevant authority has failed to perform its duty, was only responsible for rejecting these constitutional petitions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
