SHAUKAT KHAN versus STATE
Section 498 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 Prior to arrest, warrant for the charge against the accused was that he was collecting a large quantity of alcohol as a vehicle owner. , Despite a break of three months. , The investigating agency was unable to verify the ownership of the said vehicle until the chemical Examiner's presence was reported in the absence of which it cannot be said that the substance which was recovered was alcohol. Or it was unlikely that a case was registered against the accused bead, which could not be denied even before, the matter of inquiry arose in the circumstances when the accused had already been granted pre-arrest bail before bail. Was, on the same guarantee
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Sialkot lawyer