MUHAMMAD DIN versus MST. FATIMA BIBI
Section 12 law suits the specific performance of the contract to sell denial of execution of the contract by the defendant (the hanging woman), in this evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 117, 118, 119 and 129 (g), the trial The trial court dismissed, but the appellate court dismissed the same reasonable plaintiff - claiming the benefit of the contract was under the legal obligation to prove that the victim's exec had full knowledge of its contents. Before entering into the matter and executing the contract, he had free and unwanted advice The evidence on record did not meet such requirements The plaintiff did not enter the witness box himself but did inspect his son It stated that all the circumstances were explained and explained. The payment of the dues by his father could not be proved by the plaintiff's son's statement because he did not say what motive and where the plaintiff was paid to the plaintiff failed to prove the outcome of the agreement. The trial court was guilty of serious legal wrongdoing. But the evidence on the appellate court record was based on the law and the subject matter. High Court dismisses second appeal \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Lower Dir lawyer