Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

Sections 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 337a (i), 337f (i), 337f (v), 337l (II) and 452 bail, further investigation grants to both the accused. In relation to the question of the sharing of common objects by the accused in connection with the murder of the deceased, in case of any injury in the circumstances of the deceased in which the accused had died by squeezing his testicles. Further investigation is needed. The complainant and the prosecution's witnesses, under Sections 337 (i) and 337 L (II), drew up those offenses, in which the crime is guaranteed, during the same incident, the three accused also suffered injuries to their persons. He came and was examined on the day of the incident. , But said that the injured were completely suppressed in the FIR, nothing was recovered from the possession of the co-accused during the investigation, according to the FIR, the accused was charged with hatchet during the incident. But during the interrogation, only one bar was recovered. The six accused named in the FIR that ended their occupation had already been acquitted by the investigating agency, in which the first-party was found guilty of the truth of the allegations. Had a negative impact, after the completion of the investigation, the invoice had already been submitted. Physical custody of the accused in the court was not necessary for the purpose of interrogation in the circumstances; the exception of the bail should not be withheld in the case of premature punishment which calls for further investigation of his crime against the accused (2). In section 497, the CCP suspects were, in the circumstances, admitted on bail best law firm from Mingora lawyer