Find a Lawyer

SYED IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN BUKHARI versus MALIK MUHAMMAD SHARIF

A. VII, R 11 (a) Invite, rejecting the dispute because of the process, was in relation to the allotment of welfare plot by the authorities to the construction of a petrol pump by the defendants. They have the right to use the facility. In the scheme, the two courts together rejected the claim on the basis that it did not show any cause of action against the defendants. Waldetti Plante has shown that the plaintiff was the owner of the property in the scheme and as the owner the plaintiff had a case. The right to all facilities provided in the approved scheme, as such, if the plaintiff's contents are substantiated by the evidence, they may establish their right to retain plots of convenience for use. Will Such a test provided for the scheme had to be determined for the purpose that if the plaintiff showed any reason for proceeding, the two courts below were not justified in holding the suit land order passed by both the courts in the case. The plaintiffs did not disclose any rights in this regard and the case was remanded to the trial court. top advocates from Head Marala lawyer