Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus STATE

Articles 2302 and 44 32/3434 Definition of Evidence The change in sentence against the accused was of two versions, one introduced by the defense and the other by the prosecution, keeping both versions relatively in, the defendant's version of the legs. Were not And it did not appeal that the defense version could not be trusted in the circumstances that five of the three people killed were with sharp weapons, while the other two firefighter's injured prosecutors, Who appeared in the trial court. Prosecutor's Case There was no prior background of enmity between the prosecution parties. The question of false involvement in the accused case did not arise as the FIR was filed immediately, the presence of one of the accused was confirmed by the other accused. Such a case was immediately confirmed by the medical evidence in the FIR, Ocular Account, filed immediately. Investigation of the injured prosecutor, reports of firearms expert positive to the extent of two suspects, other suspects in the presence of the accused have admitted, the defense version has been denied, different approach from the point of view. There is no basis, this case was tried by the appeal of the trial, they were dismissed and the sentence filed by the trial court against the accused was kept in full remission. Was not given, the sentence could not be recorded under Section 302, PPC, but it should have been. Section 302 (b), was changed in accordance with PPC's sentence top advocates from Jandanwala lawyer