MALIK K.B. AWAN versus RANA MUHAMMAD IRSHAD
Section 5 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), the appeal against the breach of section 161 evidence that occurred between the complainant and the accused before the handing over of the accused, no doubt imprinted on the magistrate's stamped currency note. But it was unclear what had happened between the parties before the matter in the case and it was difficult to say whether the trial court had taken a stand by the accused, especially after the raid. The same plea was accepted by the accused before the magistrate and two defense witnesses were also honored in favor of the defense request. Will did. Is not denied, therefore, the trial court properly acquitted the accused by the trial court's son when he acquitted the accused, he was neither abusive nor by the trial court. The value or artificial decision which was passed did not demand the intervention of the High Court in its appeal jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Mandra lawyer
