Find a Lawyer

MST. SAEEDA BEGUM GODAR versus STATE

Sections 141414 and 1 561 of a Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 arrest of a surety bond, the interim bail was granted to the pre-arrest suspect and the applicant was granted bail and accused of not executing the required bail bond. Imposed, their application for pre-arrest bail was dismissed on grounds of illegal prosecution and the trial court initiated proceedings against the applicant / bail under Section 4Cr4 CCP and seized the applicant. A bail bond showcase notice was issued which will require him to explain why his petitioner has been challenged. N can not receive the confiscated money? He said that a show cause notice was issued on the basis that the applicant, who was standing before the bail, was abducted and subsequently killed by his rivals. This kind of bail-out and defense did not matter. Appearing when he was assassinated, the trial court must, in the circumstances, provide the applicant with the opportunity to prove it. The evidence was eaten with evidence, the trial court denied the applicant's version, summarily ordering the applicant to pay the bail amount, which the petitioner petitioner complied with and upheld. The deposit was paid from the deposit, which showed that the applicant was not aware of his legal right to challenge the order. Sessions or High Court records before the court show that the accused was allegedly killed by the party, the trial court proceeding under section 14 under advocate for immigration from Chishtian lawyer