Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus STATE

Further investigations were filed against the unidentified persons under Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 394 and 395 bail, but after the arrest of the accused, any identification to link the accused with the alleged crime. The parade was not held, allegedly for allegedly receiving net cash only nine months after the incident, but the charges will be seen at the relevant time, Section 497 (2) C A further investigation into the crime was made in the RPC circle. Outside, the circumstances of the trial could not be concluded even though almost 2 years have passed for 9 months, no evidence of any witness was recorded yet, yet the trial court's order sheet revealed that it was the prosecution. Causing delays. Despite failing to grant the prosecutor more than 26 motions to issue warrants and to present evidence against the prosecution's witnesses, he failed to produce any evidence at all. Was used until he was found guilty and could not be forgiven for his acceptance of the bail after his arrest as a guarantor, the prosecution's compensation could be paid to the accused by appropriate sentencing and appropriate punishment, But in the event that the accused is acquitted, he cannot be relieved of his imprisonment on the basis of false accusations. The accused, who has long been serving a premature trial, is entitled to bail. The accused was also entitled to grant bail due to the rules. Persistence, since his co-accused was allowed pre-arrest bail, the suspect was admitted to bail, under circumstances \ r tax advocates from Rashidabad lawyer