TUFAIL HAIDER versus STATE
The bail application was withdrawn by the accused before the Bail Trial Court before retaining the section 497 Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), sections 395, 354, 506, 448, 511, 342, 148 and 149 bail. The defendant's case was that the complainant in this case was a former civil judge and his daughter was a Guardian judge and because of this the trial court could have influenced the complainant, instead of the trial directly guaranteed by the High Court. There are no unusual circumstances to guarantee application fun. The first time a bail application was filed directly before the High Court was not practicable.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Naukundi lawyer
