SARDAR BALAL AHMAD DHILON versus AFTAB AHMAD CHEEMA
Article 204 contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), sections 3 and 4 contempt of court petitioner demanded contempt of court proceedings against the respondents in connection with the alleged violation of the High Court order passed in the constitutional petition. Was. The High Court did not immediately instruct the concerned station house officer to register any criminal case, but said it was in fact a conditional order that the matter be disclosed to the applicant's request to the satisfaction of the station house officer of the police station. Was related to the commission. The clear disclosure of a conviction by a station house officer clearly showed that he had considered the High Court order regularly and came to that conclusion. Whether it was true or false in the applicant's request. Do not disclose a commission related to a crime committed by the relevant station house officer, in the High Court, under the circumstances. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Kundina lawyer
