Find a Lawyer

TARIQ HAMEED versus STATE

The prosecution's testimony of the Sections 302 (b) and 302 (c) testimony was admitted by the prosecution as unreliable, especially when no independent witnesses from the locality had proven the same when the prosecution witnesses testified. Attempts to improve his evidence at the hearing that three eyewitnesses, who were very close to the victim, could not arrest the 19-year-old at the time of the incident, were not sure to file the full details of the accused. Before the Investigation Officer submitted, a very close relative of the complainant, who was an eyewitness, was successfully prosecuted by the prosecution. Being a Roman, he was released. Because he refused to support a false case of prosecution, the accused, who was not seen through eyewitnesses and statements, remained on the field for consideration, which was given to police. This was supported by the publication of the version of the accused in the first two editions of the first edition and the next two days thereafter. The killings were not presented by the defendants in their defense in an attempt to try and foil the sodomy attempt by relevant news reporters who killed the incident, but did not ignore the news in strange circumstances. It could have been, the prosecution was not so heavy on display on the record of the evidence of the defense's plea to the accused, as the defendant had only to show the truth of his version of the defense request was not without precedent and even though the accused did not This was confirmed. Do not choose to appear as your own witness, but the molecular evidence and motions established by the prosecution law firms from Jandanwala lawyer