Find a Lawyer

TAJ MALOOK versus E. A. C. I, SWAT

Deputies, Schedule 3, 4, and Schedule Deputy Commissioners of the Provincial Administrative Territories' Criminal Laws (Special Supplies) Regulations 1975, dismissing the previous award and directing the new trial, said that the new jirga should record the latest evidence. Such an observation was made incorrectly. The recording of the latest evidence has been banned because it has to decide whether or not to seek arbitration powers of the new jirga, the latest evidence jirga was free to record the latest evidence and if they were to be relied upon If found to be appropriate and acceptable, can rely on previous evidence as well. Based on which the former juror was actually convicted and admitted that no evidence was recorded during the fresh trial for collecting fresh material, without any new evidence being recorded. It was meaningless to hold a fresh case, and to rely on evidence that the jury had already rejected. After the High Court has collected fresh material from unfair proceedings to re-judge by another jirga property advocates from Rajanpur lawyer