MUHAMMAD AFZAAL versus STATE
Sections 2302 (b), 4 324 and 7 337f (ii) define the evidence as motive for the fact that the deceased's daughter had come to her deceased father's home because of a strained relationship with her husband / accused. The defense was not seriously challenged in this aspect of the prosecution case, while the prosecution witnesses were examined and killed near the outer gate of his house and witnesses witnessed the incident. Those who were natural witnesses related to the deceased and their presence on the spot was natural and all witnesses who were present at the hearing agreed before the trial court. That it was the accused who stabbed the deceased witnesses with various thefts, while appearing before the trial court, saying that the evidence of the witnesses' confidence was affected, which could be relied on in the ocular account. The scope, as described by eyewitnesses, was confirmed by the location, duration and nature of the injuries. During the interrogation, the crime weapon, theft, was also recovered from the accused, which was of significant importance, which cannot be ruled out simply because the weapon was not bloodshot. The trial was a cold-blooded murder and no basis for reduction of sentence was laid, after the prosecution proved the motion against the accused, the appeal of the accused against the trial verdict was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Akhora Khattak lawyer