HAFIZ NAUMAN versus STATE
Prior to the arrest of Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), 5 498 F, the defendant's denial had confessed that the accused had been issued pending checks and due to insufficient funds on the account of the accused, Was honored In another such case, which filed a complaint against the accused by the complainant's son, the complainant's son's statement allowed the accused to pre-arrest bail that he had been compromised. He didn't mind approving the bail. The complainant's son's statement that all business disputes between the parties have been resolved does not doubt that in the absence of a prohibited clause of section 497, approval of the CC guarantee was a rule and with the exception. There was denial, but the accused was a case. Was unusual and not under the principle that the complainant had a large sum of money and he did not intend to return it despite the offer made by the complainant's lawyer. In addition to being allowed to pay money in installments before the court, the accused was also involved in some other cases of the same nature that speak volumes about his conduct, was charged, guaranteed. Was not entitled to concessions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sagri lawyer