Find a Lawyer

SHOUKAT SULTAN versus HAJI MUHAMMAD ALAM

Defendants of the suit constitutional petition for Article 9 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199, suit claimed that they were in permanent possession of the suit land and that the defendants forcibly occupied the suit land and constructed the boundary wall. And the Khathari plaintiff in his writings, it was claimed that the other defendant had sold the suit to him and the possession was handed over to him by the trial court's order, but the judgment and order The court confirmed the review filed by the defendants against the lawsuit and dismissed the defendants' claims. The petitioners, who filed a constitutional petition against such dismissal scope register, showed that the plaintiffs had been sued in the possession of the suit land The amending court proceeded to exclude the evidence on record hold that was once participatory. Is in the possession of the partner, yet it cannot be expelled. Forced-occupied court acted in the disappearance of the law where the partner was deported by another participant, then he had two options, that is, he could either wait and May file a lawsuit for division or he may file a case under section 9 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, in the present case the case was subsequently registered. After 10 days of settlement, all the components of Section 9 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, were settled by trial court law, and the order of the reviewing court was declared without legal authority and Was isolated. The court adjourned the judgment of the defendants and reinstated them. \ r \ n immigration advocates contact from Laliah lawyer