NASIR MEHMOOD versus STATE
Section 396 Definition of evidence Benefits of doubt The presence of the accused Wajitkar evidence was involved in the complainant's subpoena and after the trial he was convicted and sentenced to death at the scene of five persons. Presence, as alleged by the prosecutor. Based on the defendant's involvement and Wajitkar's testimony through a reasonable statement, the prosecution's witnesses made several reforms, which during their statements during the controversy over statements made under Section 161, CR. Highlighted. The PC does not have any evidence to show that the recovered articles were mixed with other similar items and did not provide any specific identification mark to prove it through credible evidence. Were present on the articles that were recovered from the accused, therefore, no affiliate could be held on such recoveries. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond any reasonable doubt, using the jurisdiction of the appeal. , The accused were convicted and sentenced and allowed to appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Machh lawyer