THE PRESIDENT, FRONTIER PROVINCIAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD versus LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, N.-W.F.P
Article 25 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 and 65 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), delayed Article 199, terminated the hiring of employees who challenged the same in the civil suit which failed and also appealed. The dismissal application of the employees was dismissed, which was withdrawn then referred to the Labor Court, which rejected the employer's dismissal order, but the Labor Appeal Tribunal employer filed a constitutional petition saying The Industrial Relations Ordinance was banned for more than 8 years for proceedings under the jurisdiction of the court Employees did not request that his request be delayed under Article 65B of the Ordinance, this employee had already followed his remedies with good faith in the civil courts and at the moment when he received the correct forum Got it. In order to resolve his complaint, he was considered under section 25A of the ordinance and the INP, which filed proceedings against the applicants, applied for delayed condolences and the matter was heard before the Labor Court and the Labor Appellate Court. Was not raised, nor has it clearly raised these grounds in the constitutional petition, was misunderstood by factual and legal aspects and was excluded under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Chishtian lawyer