Find a Lawyer

AMIR ABDULLAH versus TOTA

Provincially Administered Tribal Areas Civil Code (Special Provisions) Regulation 1975 Section 4 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 suit was raised in a custody statement, instead of the preliminary objection on which the case was stayed. Instead of deciding the limit, a law was created on its own. Referring the Jirga and the matter referred to in its report, the Authority can only refer the matter to the Jirga if it concludes that the case was within time, if the Authority concludes that any such case should be referred to the customs. ) Is banned or the use of force is prohibited. The law, then, could not send the case to the juror suit, the defendant's statement in the statement written by the defendants was without legal authority and had no legal effect, even though it concluded. Has come to do The case was timely banned, yet it did not forward the case to the invalid order of the authority. The authority, the appellate authority and the Revenue Authority's arrays were set aside by the High Court in their constitutional jurisdiction. And the matter was remanded to the authority, making the first decision on the boundary question and if it concludes that the case is not time bound, then proceed only according to the provisions of the Code. advocate from Depal Pur lawyer