Find a Lawyer

LAI SHAHADAT KHAN versus GUL MARJANA

The Convention on Evidence Order 1984 Article 118 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the Section 42 mutation, to prove that the plaintiff, an amnesty woman, caused a mutation in the dispute under which she had received property Having been deprived of his share, defendant had to prove the fact of the above, to present the charge that the defendant presented only to the commissioner appointed by the Revenue Officer to reject the plaintiff's proof of the commissioner. Because it was not satisfactory that he did not know the plaintiff personally and the persons who had done so before the Commissioner The plaintiff had identified he was not the plaintiff in the evidence. In a written statement, the defendant attempted to make a different case than the one disclosed in the written statement, claiming that the plaintiff had received a sale case, while the transfer of evidence showed evidence of being affected by the gift. The evidence from the petition affects the defendant's deviation. All the evidence as suspicious evidence shows that plaintiff W as unaware of the mutation and, as soon as he became aware of it, filed a lawsuit. top civil advocates from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer