Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAH versus SAID AHMAD SHAH

Limitation Act 1908 Arts 142 and 144 Convention evidence (Article 10 of 1984), Article 72 Proof of ownership is not contradictory document on the referee's decision regarding the dispute between the plaintiffs' defendants and the defendant in which the plaintiff's special possession. Contains judgment. At the same time in the evidence, it was objected that the issue of recovery was heard by the elders and the defendants for their decision, after hearing the parties citing a dispute of property to a unanimous referee. The decision was taken after the parties took oath, under which the defendant was suspended. In the special judgment, the special owner of the property, including the property in the suit referee, specifically mentioned that the plaintiffs / defendants had relinquished their claim to the property, having no objection to the verification, authenticity or acceptance of the same document when preparing it. He was picked up at the time of Legal claims can be made against the claimants who claim that the document is authenticated as the actual referee who testified in support of this document testified to the implementation of the document, as it cannot be doubted. Was an unwanted person and the plaintiff failed to bring anything in the record to show that he existed in any way infringing on them or writing such a document of confidentiality to the defendants, especially in the written statement. Was given and the plaintiff could not present any evidence to substantiate its execution or to invalidate its contents, The defendants prove themselves master of the matter. advocate from Khanewal lawyer