Find a Lawyer

TARIQ ABDULLAH versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Definition of Evidence The benefit of the doubt was that the prosecution failed to prove to any extent that the substance allegedly recovered from the possession of the accused was an intoxicating FIR and the recovery of the memorandum has been disclosed. Examples of the suspects that were allegedly recovered from the drugs were found in the ghetto / bag and marijuana, and opium was placed in two separate shopping bags along with the FIR, as well as the collection of the memorandum. A sample of 50 grams was taken from a shopping bag containing marijuana. Another 50g sample was obtained from another shopping bag containing opium and the samples taken were sent to the Chemical Examiner for their analysis. The samples analyzed were 40 in number and each sample weighed 200 grams, indicating that the samples analyzed by the Chemical Examiner were not the ones that were immediately taken on substance recovery upon the report of the accused. But no explanation is available as to how the original two samples weighing 50 grams contained 40 grams weighing 40 grams Became and was completely unable to connect each prosecution Chemical Examiner reports. The accused prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt with the substance recovered, the trial court sentenced the defendant and the sentence was set aside, And the accused was acquitted of the charge by increasing the benefit of the doubt. He was released from jail pakistani advocates Guddu lawyer