Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus MST. SHAHEEN AKHTAR

Article 5, Schedule and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution suit provides many opportunities for the applicant to examine the defendant's testimony and present evidence to recover the restitution allowance. But they failed to cross-examine the defendants' testimony and present their evidence. The Effective Trial Court, in any case, had no choice but to examine the applicant's testimony and close its evidence. The final decision to make should be made. This case will be open for appeal under section 14 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964 and if the applicant fails before the Family Court, he can control the appellate court's order before the trial before it is fair. Will Of a fair and inward nature, which demanded that the principles of the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction not be interfered with law firms from Bhirya Road lawyer