ABDUL WAHID versus GHULAM MUJADDAD
Section 17 and 24 Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O XVII, R 3 of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963, granted some delays to the preparation of evidence to the 3-tenant. On the date of the unlawful order, the tenant and one of his witnesses were present, in which case the tenant's statements and the testimony of his witness were bound to be recorded, and after re-issuing his search on the matters, the merit Was to decide on the withdrawal request. Not only was it built without looking into the legal process but it also suffered a miscarriage of justice and thus could not be maintained so that the tenant had only one chance, with the direction of the tenant to seek remand. After providing, the tenant was presented with the entire evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Fateh Pur lawyer