Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH versus STATE

His officer was a defendant in denial of bail, Section 497 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 32, 32A, 14, 14A, 156 (1), 2 (O), 3 (G) and 2 (PA). In the meaning of section 2 (o), read with section 3 (g) of the Customs Department Customs Act, 1969, and it cannot be said that it has no other capability of the natural person ie a person. ? The definition given in clause 2 (PA) includes only certain categories which are in the sense of the person and does not exclude other natural and legal persons from the definition of person for the purposes of the said Act. I have clearly made it clear that other persons who may be legally declared as persons shall also be treated as persons for the purposes of the Act. He was allegedly convicted by the accused, had dual qualifications, one as a customs officer and the other. A natural person; thus, if the accused has committed a crime, he cannot be excluded on the basis that he is a customs officer, nor is the person on record who has alleged that he did some inspection during the relevant period. What was not in accordance with the law. The indictment that was allegedly brought under the prohibition clause of section 497, CCP Bell was denied the accused under the circumstances. online advocate from Zahir Pir lawyer