Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) excluded the possibility of filing an FIR without any loss, in advance and without consultation, was located in an intermittent busy place as the incident occurred and the accused was charged by the complainant. There was no possibility of a change. Even otherwise, it was an extraordinary event that no rivalry between the parties and the relatives of the deceased could be expected that he would spare the real culprit and add anyone else to the murder. The eyewitnesses had fully confirmed each other in all material aspects of the case. The contradictions in their statements were unnatural because of the slightest in nature when the presence of eyewitnesses at the scene was natural, which was not seriously questioned even by the defense. Ocular testimony is unrecognizable and credible. Was confident and supported by medical evidence, which was conclusive. Until the time of the incident, the casualty's seat of injury and the use of recoil were weapons. At the instance of the suspects, the blood-stained knife was proved by independent evidence, which the Chemical Examiner confirmed. Blood is stained and the conviction of the accused is maintained in the circumstances. property advocate from Jalozai lawyer