Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUSTAFA ALIAS JARI versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) evidence testimony The benefit of the suspect was filed with a delay of thirty-five minutes to an hour even though the police station was half a kilometer away, while the ocular account of the incident presented by all three witnesses There was a conflict. Other witnesses raised serious doubts about the authenticity of the eyewitness testimony about the evidence provided in the case, on the seat of the injury caused by the material correction and contradictions of the accused. Medical evidence testified to the incident. According to the report, no evidence was found that no weapon was recovered from the occupation of the accused and no result was recovered from a busy place a day after the same crime. In the absence of any other material evidence on the record against him, the accused was acquitted on the basis of his conviction on the benefit of a D sentence. tax advocates from Piaro goth lawyer