Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA KHAN versus MESSRS PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS, KARACHI

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (4) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXII of 1969), Section 25A & 38 (3), the accused acquitted for corruption within one month Will be notified in writing. Regarding the date of mismanagement or the date on which it appears that the employer of the applicant has specifically mentioned in the complaint request that the inquiry proceedings under section O 15 (4) be made without specific mention Has been declared volatile while the alleged corruption took place. On its notice, it is retained, to prove that the statement of a witness is either based on a knowledge-based statement derived from a statement of competent authority or on the basis of any documentary evidence, excluding such officer. Was not enough to do so, ie not authorized authority. In self-evidence, to show when the alleged mismanagement came to fruition, there is a dispute that the alleged misconduct based on a written report submitted by the lower level of the administration to a large organization. It must have taken some time for the notice to be withdrawn due to the absence of evidence as the alleged mismanagement came to the notice of the employer, leaving the showcase notice too high to dismiss the history of the alleged corruption. The order is, in these circumstances, declared illegal and void, so will be set aside by the appellate tribunal. And employees have been ordered to restore the full backup and served with benefits. best law firm from Pindi gheb lawyer