Find a Lawyer

SYED TEHZEEBUL HASNAIN ZAIDI versus PAKISTAN STEEL FABRICATING CO. LTD.

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 36 and 38 (3) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVII, R10 and OXVII, R1 Initial issue relating to the application and conduct of a complaint requiring proof Is that the request made by the applicants rather than the evidence on the preliminary matter for the order of the Labor Court did not invalidate the request that the petitioner asserted that the written statement could not be verified with this person. Which can be considered an employer so no written statement will be filed. After the parties hear the question, the Labor Court should be allowed to determine whether the person confirming the written statement was an employer or not, after the evidence is recorded, as it is a question of fact whether the applicant It was directed to file an affidavit in support of the failure of his application, in which the Labor Court decision dismissed his request. The petitioner had insisted on the wrong decision on the initial matter. d It was not proper for him to disobey the Labor Court order and to file an affidavit with evidence to support his request. inheritance advocates near Skardu lawyer