Find a Lawyer

BAHAWAL KHAN versus STATE

Section (c) Appraising the evidence The prosecution's evidence was extremely convincing and no motive was available for inclusion of the accused in connection with the raid by the police. Both the accused were arrested and charged in large quantities. The drug was recovered. Such a huge thing could not be falsified that the quantities of the drugs were recovered and sent for chemical analysis. Evidence of their recovery was established permanently by two prosecution witnesses and exported. The Chemical Examiner's report with regard to the substance of the substance is also positive; Rizan was endorsed, statements of prosecution witnesses may have some contradictions or contradictions, but he remained firm on the material points. Gone because the policemen were so good as witnesses that someone else accused them under Section 2, 2, CRPC, saying that they were raided in this case due to enmity with two persons but Their content was not recorded to prove that they were innocent, their claim did not result. The version presented by the accused thought that the prosecutor had, without any reasonable doubt, proved his case against the accused, the appeal of the accused was dismissed, but since the accused was ex-offender, His punishment was reduced from life imprisonment to seven years in prison, however mild list of supreme court advocates from Jaja Abasian lawyer