Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAJID versus STATE

Testimony of Articles 666 and 7 337b Proof of trial No trial was taken before the trial trial before the trial court and it was decided by the successor trial court and also at that stage when the prosecution If the evidence is exhausted, it shows that there is no separate statement of the accused. The effect was recorded after the charge was framed. Whether the accused will rely on the statements of the prosecution witnesses before the indictment or the prosecutor's witnesses may be summoned, the matter was kept on trial on remand as a record entry, at this stage after the trial. Will take action. It was alleged that the accused would remain in jail till the trial court's decision top civil advocates from Ambela lawyer