Find a Lawyer

DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, KARACHI versus SYED HASSAN ABBAS

Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973) Section 2 Factories Act (XXV of 1934), Section 2 (h) Workers Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), Section 2 (n) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI) (1968), Section (4) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A & 38 (3) Clerk in the jurisdiction of Labor Court employees of the Pakistan Railway, in the Administrative District or all employees employed in the carriage and wagon workshop Not working in the division. The Railway Office is not a civil servant but a worker, as defined under Section 2 (h) of the Factories Act, 1934 and Section 2 (n) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, Railway Servants (Talent and Discipline). (Discipline) Rules, 1975 are applicable legal rules. For all employees and not just those who are covered under the Civil Servant Provisions for West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968, applicable railway employees may not be appreciated by civil servants. On the basis of section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, the Labor Court had jurisdiction to enforce its right under the Railway Code or the Qualification and Discipline Rules, 1975 on this basis. Removed that they did not pass the typing test without removing the service. The rule of law was not sustained, sustained, and the appeal of the Labor Court order dismissing and restoring the order remains intact. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer