MUHAMMAD JAMIL versus STATE
In such cases as the testimony of Section 9 (b), the police officer was a good witness, as the members of the Chief Investigation Officer and his accomplices could not be expected to be hostile to the accused, as the prosecution's evidence in the case led to him. Was added incorrectly Do not suffer any contradictions or contradictions The Chemical Examiner's report confirmed that the material recovered from the suspect was allegedly marijuana, which proved to be a drug addiction, but his sentence was already punished. Was reduced to a period that is sufficient. Fulfilling the pursuit of justice \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Khanqah Dogran lawyer
